Thursday, January 28, 2016

Wild Pig Vocalizations and Trap Aversion - Video Blog

By: Josh Helcel, Extension Associate



Both domestic and wild pigs (Sus scrofa) are highly vocal and communicative species.  Research indicated these animals use a wide range of vocalizations to express distress, surprise, excitement and other emotional content including general welfare (Newberry et al. 1988; Marx et al. 2003; Manteuffel et al. 2004; Düpjan et al. 2008; Tallet et al. 2010; Chan et al. 2011).  While more research is needed on the role of vocalizations among wild populations, the video below suggests that wild pigs can potentially use vocalizations to communicate trap avoidance.

This video below details a trapping effort in which wild pigs triggered a manually activated trigger prior to the entire “sounder” or family group of animals entering the enclosure.  While this “incomplete capture” could potentially have been avoided through proper trigger placement and the use of a larger tire trigger (13 – 16 in. diameter), what is unique about this event is that no such vocalizations were documented previously in the pre-baiting process.  After these interactions, the remainder of the sounder were not documented to return to the trap site for over a month.  Click the link below to see and listen to what happened.


Many experienced trappers maintain that capturing the entire sounder of wild pigs in one trapping event is paramount in achieving success.  Due to the intelligence and adaptability of these animals trap aversion can occur in a variety of ways. Incomplete captures are certainly one way this can happen, and as this video shows vocalizations between captured and free ranging individuals can potentially communicate future trap avoidance.

For information on how to effectively trap an entire sounder of wild pigs, please view How to Corral Trap Wild Pigs or Corral Trapping Wild Pigs: A Success Story from Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service’s Wild Pig Management Video Series.

Wild pig resources listed below are available at the AgriLife Bookstore


– L-5523 Recognizing Feral Hog Sign

– L-5524 Corral Traps for Capturing Feral Hogs

– L-5525 Box Traps for Capturing Feral Hogs

– L-5526 Placing and Baiting Feral Hog Traps

– L-5527 Door Modifications for Feral Hog Traps

– L-5528 Snaring Feral Hog

– L-5529 Making a Feral Hog Snare

– SP-419 Feral Hogs Impact Ground-nesting Birds

– SP-420 Feral Hog Laws and Regulations

– SP-421 Feral Hogs and Disease Concerns

– SP-422 Feral Hogs and Water Quality in Plum Creek

– SP-423 Feral Hog Transportation Regulations

– L-5533 Using Fences to Exclude Feral Hogs from Wildlife Feeding Stations
– WF-030 Reducing non-target species interference while trapping wild pigs
Click here for additional resources or visit feralhogs.tamu.edu


For free educational programming or technical assistance with wild pigs please contact us:

Josh Helcel, Central and North Central Texas, 512-554-3785, josh.helcel@tamu.edu

Mark Tyson, South and Southeast Texas, 979-845-4698, mark.tyson@tamu.edu

Literature Cited


Marx, G., T. Horn, J. Thielebein, B. Knubel and E. Von Borell. 2003. Analysis of pain-related vocalization in young pigs. Journal of Sound and Vibration 266: 687–698.


Chan, W.Y., S. Cloutier and R.C . Newberry. 2011. Barking pigs: differences in acoustic morphology predict juvenile responses to alarm calls. Animal Behaviour. 82: 767–774.


Newberry R.C., D.G.M. Woodgush and J.W. Hall. 1988. Playful behavior of piglets. Behavioural Processes. 17: 205–216.


Düpjan, S., P.C. Schön, B. Puppe, A. Tuchscherer and G. Manteuffel. 2008. Differential vocal responses to physical and mental stressors in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 114: 105–115.


Tallet, C., M. Špinka, I. Maruscàkovà, P. Simecek. 2010. Human perception of vocalizations of domestic piglets and modulation by experience with domestic pigs (Sus scrofa). Journal of Comparative Psychology. 124: 81–91.


Manteuffel G., B. Puppe and P.C. Schön. 2004. Vocalization of farm animals as a measure of welfare. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 88: 163–182.