By: Mark Tyson, M.S.
Box traps are commonly used in wild pig management because
of their portability, utility and ease of deployment. Yet research conducted in
Georgia found that box traps were much less effective than larger more
permanent corral traps (Williams et al. 2011). While corral traps are more
effective, box traps can be a great tool for urban homeowners attempting to
remove a very small number of pigs damaging
their property. Additionally recreational trappers often utilize box traps to
acquire organic free-range pork for consumption.
Figure
1. Spring-driven side-swing door (left) and gravity-driven partitioned rooter
style door (right). (Image credit: D. Long and T. Campbell)
After
analyzing the capture data, the researchers could not identify any difference in
capture rates between gate types based on gender alone. However the data
indicated that juvenile capture rates and total capture rates was higher in box
traps equipped with the gravity-driven partitioned rooter style door (Long and
Campbell 2012).
The
greater success attributed to the rooter style door was accomplished through
higher juvenile capture rates. It is thought that the partitioned sections of the rooter style door allowed
juveniles easier access into the trap. Additionally the rooter style door was twice as wide as the side-swing door,
this may have increased its effectiveness as well.
Literature
Cited
Long,
D. and T. Campbell. 2012. Box traps for feral swine capture: a
comparison of gate styles in Texas.
Wildlife Society Bulletin 36:741-746.
Williams,
B. L., R. W. Holtfreter, S. S. Ditchkoff, and J. B. Grand. 2011.
Trap Style influences wild pig behavior and trapping success. Journal of Wildlife Management 75:432-436.