Texas Quail Index 2014 Summary: Part I
Thirty-six
counties participated in 2014 across the state, representing the Rolling
Plains, Gulf Coast, Edwards Plateau, High Plains, Cross Timbers, and Blackland
Prairie Ecoregions. During April and May,
we held 5 different 2-day training sessions attended by 71 people including
landowners, county agents, Texas Parks and Wildlife biologists, and Texas
Master Naturalists volunteers. The properties in each county varied in size,
ownership, and management. The properties ranged in size from just over 1,000
acres to over 500,000 acres. They included private lands, Wildlife Management Areas,
and even a National Wildlife Refuge. They do have one thing in common, however:
each landowner or manager has an interest in increasing the abundance of quail
on their property, whether for additional hunting income or just sheer
enjoyment of the resource.
Burnet County Texas Master Naturalist volunteers conducting spring call counts. Photo by Wade Hibler. |
The
first task in the TQI was spring call counts. Participants were required to
start immediately following their training April. Spring call counts are a
measure of the population's breeding capital (to learn about how to conduct a spring
call count, click here: http://youtu.be/-fB3gRRvn8I). Three factors
contribute to the variation in the number of birds that you count: population
size, how actively the quail are calling, and your ability to detect those
quail. The detection of calling quail is
in turn influenced by another whole host of other factors including the wind
speed at the time of the count, ambient noise (e.g. oil field traffic or other species
of birds), and the listener’s hearing ability.
When we conduct these counts we try to control for detection as much as
possible so that we are just measuring the combined influence of the population
size and calling activity. The percentage of males calling in a population of
quail is thought to be influenced by their willingness to breed for the year
and the environmental conditions present. This measure of breeding capital is
then comparable (in a rough sense) to other sites across in the TQI and (most
applicable) on the same site year after year. When judging the response of spring call counts, an
approximate rule-of-thumb is as follows: counts from 0-3 are considered poor,
3-6 are considered fair, and 6-9 are considered good. Counts above 9 are
excellent, but it is difficult to distinguish individual quail above 9 roosters
per stop. The
map and graph below illustrates the average number of quail heard calling per mile marker
across the participating sites.
Colloquial
wisdom in quail country is that the best time to hear birds calling is
immediately following a rain. We were able to test that wisdom using the data from
the TQI last spring during the spring call counts. Prior to the Memorial Day
weekend in 2014 most of Texas remained dry and in severe drought conditions.
Then a large storm system moved across the state delivering up to 5 inches of
rain on some of our TQI sites. Just by chance, 7 counties conducted counts
immediately before the rain and immediately after. We compared the average
number of bobwhites calling at each mile marker on each site before and after
the rain event. We found that the number of individual bobwhite roosters
calling doubled following the rain event across the 7 sites. Furthermore, the
average number of calls per bird did not increase contrary to what you might
expect. They were still calling at the rate of roughly one call per 20 seconds;
there were just more birds calling at each site. All of those quail had been
present before the rain, but something about the rain we received prompted more
birds to call.