Monday, November 25, 2013

The Porkchopper: Aerial Hunting of Feral Hogs

By: Dan Gaskins, Extension Assistant
            For a few years now it has been legal to hunt feral hogs from the air. By far the most polarizing (legal) control method, it is a major source of controversy. As this method becomes more widespread, I get more questions about the viability, efficiency, cost, and safety of aerial gunning.


Photo Courtesy Texas Wildlife Services
The Pros:
Aerial gunning can be very effective, when done by experienced personnel and under the right conditions. A study in South Texas (Campbell et al., 2010) had removal rates of 9 and 27 pigs per hour, depending on the site. This suggests that it is possible for quite a few animals to be removed in a single day. It is also a viable option for absentee landowners or landowners that do not have the time to dedicate to trapping or running snares.
In 2011, the Texas Legislature passed the so-called “Porkchopper Bill” that allows landowners and contractors to sell seats in the helicopter to a third party. This helps defray the expense (see below) of hiring a contractor to preform aerial operations. Due to the recreational opportunity shooting pigs on the run from a helicopter can provide, there is a large number of people willing to pay for the experience. This has the potential to reduce or completely eliminate the cost to the landowner.
The Cons:
The cost can be prohibitive, with companies charging from $400 per hour to over $1,000 per hour. As mentioned above, by selling a seat to a third party, landowners can reduce or eliminate this cost, but then there is a question of safety. Texas law states the only qualification for buying a helicopter hunt is a hunting license. Some landowners have concerns about people who have never even been in a helicopter firing a weapon from one. Some companies have begun requiring their clients undergo training to prepare them for a safe and effective hunt.
Aerial hunting is also only effective on certain types of properties. Gunners need a clean line of sight which means the pilot has to be able to flush the pigs into the open. In heavy or tall vegetation, such as the piney woods, this may not be possible. This method also requires quite a bit of space to be practical and safe. Smaller properties may need to be grouped together to provide enough space, which requires multiple landowner’s approval and the pilot to be very careful about which properties they fly onto. This type of flying also takes a fair amount of skill on the part of the pilot.
There is also evidence that aerial gunning decreases in effectiveness over time. Studies conducted in Australia (Choquenot et al. 1999) suggest that as the population density decreases, so does the efficacy of the method. Also, while it has yet to be specifically studied, pigs have shown the ability to become educated and hide from the helicopter. This behavior was specifically documented in Australia (Saunders and Bryant 1988) with two radio-collared pigs that had survived the aerial gunning operation. Attempts to flush the pigs from cover were unsuccessful. This behavior is supported by anecdotal evidence, however until it is specifically studied it will remain uncertain to what extent this behavior affects aerial gunning effectiveness.  Campbell et al. found that aerial gunning only displaced pigs short distances and for short periods of time, suggesting that it does not work as a tool to harass the pigs away from an area permanently.
The Answer:
In the end, there is no one answer to which method is best. In some situations, aerial gunning could be the best choice. For example, a 1000 acre ranch in the coastal prairie could benefit from an aerial gunning operation. On the other hand, a 20 acre property in the pineywoods probably wouldn’t find it practical. In the Statewide Feral Hog Abatement Pilot Project, Texas A&M Agrilife Extension found that in the pineywoods and post oak savannah ecological regions, vegetation prevented the use of aerial gunning as a viable control option while it was the most effective method in the coastal prairie (Higginbotham et al. 2008).
When hiring a contractor for an aerial gunning operation, do a little research on the company first. What kind of experience do they have? What is their track record? What safety measures do they use? Only hire someone you feel comfortable with, because, after all, you are giving them permission to shoot out of a helicopter on your property.
Prior to the passage of the “Porkchopper” Bill (2007-2010), Texas Parks and Wildlife Department approved an average of 1,511 Landowner Authorizations for aerial control of feral hogs. In 2012, TPWD approved 1,883 Landowner Authorizations, a 25% increase. The 2007-2010 average number of pigs taken annually by helicopter was 14,800. In 2012, 24,061 pigs were taken, a 63% increase. The bill is having the intended effect: more landowners are turning to aerial hunting to control their pig populations.
Finally, I would caution landowners against seeing an aerial gunning operation as a “one and done” option. Even if every pig on your property is removed in one fell swoop, that does not mean you will be pig free for the rest of time. Feral hog “control” is a process, not an act. Continue monitoring your property for signs that pigs are present and take appropriate steps.
When done correctly and under the right conditions, aerial gunning can be an effective control method for feral hogs. Contact Texas Parks and Wildlife Department for more information on rules, documents, and aerial gunning in your area.
The hyper-linked resource document below will provide you with quick access to many of our online feral hog resources including publications, fact sheets and videos.

 
For free educational programming or technical assistance with feral hogs please contact us:
Dan Gaskins, North Central Texas, 254-248-0532, dan.gaskins@tamu.edu
Jared Timmons, South Central Texas, 254-485-4886, jbtimmons@ag.tamu.edu
Mark Tyson, Southeast Texas, 979-845-4698, mark.tyson@ag.tamu.edu

Our services are provided free of charge through a Clean Water Act 319(h) non-point source grant from the Texas State Soil and Water Conservation Board and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency